Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/J. C. Daniel Award/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:30, 22 September 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]
J. C. Daniel Award (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Charles Turing (talk) 16:09, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Instituted by Government of Kerala, the J. C. Daniel Award is the highest honour in Malayalam cinema. I hope this prestigious award will find a spot in the Featured Lists of English Wikipedia. Looking for some constructive suggestions. Charles Turing (talk) 16:09, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "is the highest award in Malayalam cinema." says who?
- It is a Kerala government award. Changed to "Kerala's highest award in Malayalam cinema".--Charles Turing (talk) 09:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Was it not awarded in 2015? If not, then this should be explained. If so, then the article needs updating.
- 2015 award is yet to announce.--Charles Turing (talk) 09:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- 2015 award has announced, updated.--Charles Turing (talk) 09:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- "hosted the award.[6][1] " prefer citations in numerical order.
- Done.--Charles Turing (talk) 09:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- For the 2003 award, I don't really know what " due to some technical corrections" means.
- Source says "The award should have been given for 2003, but was being updated to 2004 as part of a technical correction and would carry a cash prize of Rs. 1 lakh and a citation,".--Charles Turing (talk) 09:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you find any other sources to expand on what this "technical correction" really was? The Rambling Man (talk) 19:38, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Puzzle solved. The technical correction was updating the prize money. The source does not mention about the prize hike. Additional source added for that. Thanks Rambling Man. I actually missed that point.--Charles Turing (talk) 14:50, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you find any other sources to expand on what this "technical correction" really was? The Rambling Man (talk) 19:38, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Source says "The award should have been given for 2003, but was being updated to 2004 as part of a technical correction and would carry a cash prize of Rs. 1 lakh and a citation,".--Charles Turing (talk) 09:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- No images at all for this?
- Unfortunately not.--Charles Turing (talk) 09:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- An image added.--Charles Turing (talk) 09:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- In table No Award -> No award
- Done.--Charles Turing (talk) 09:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing major really, just a few comments and queries. The Rambling Man (talk) 12:09, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Also worth checking that every recipient in the list links to this article, if, after all, it is the highest award they are likely to obtain... The Rambling Man (talk) 12:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man: Sorry for the late reply. It was not a delay. I just saw your comment now.--Charles Turing (talk) 09:09, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment; don't link India; MoS discourages to link well-known cities and countries. FrB.TG (talk) 09:15, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Unlinked.--Charles Turing (talk) 07:24, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, The Rambling Man left zilch for me to pick up on. A comprehensive list with a well-written prose and reliale sources. Great work! FrB.TG (talk) 13:43, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the support FrB.TG.--Charles Turing (talk) 14:53, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Ditto, I've read through the prose and couldn't spot and issues. This list is comprehensive, well written, and the sources all check out. Well done! JAGUAR 10:48, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Jaguar I appreciate it. Charles Turing (talk) 11:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Nothing to fault here. You could possibly consider adding Alt text for the image, though the caption does much the same job in this case anyway. Harrias talk 09:03, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Source Review
- Formatting: You don't need "staff reporter" or "correspondent" or any of that- the author fields are for specific, named people
- Spotchecks: pass
- Completeness: pass
Only issue is the minor formatting problem; I've just gone ahead an done it myself so that this nomination can pass. --PresN 21:22, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.