Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Hugo Award for Best Semiprozine/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 21:55, 24 September 2010 [1].

Hugo Award for Best Semiprozine

Featured list candidates/Hugo Award for Best Semiprozine/archive1

Nominator(s): Pres N 16:45, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Back again, with the Hugo Award for Best ~~Novel~~ ~~Novella~~ ~~Novelette~~ ~~Short Story~~ ~~Related Work~~ ~~Professional Magazine~~ Semiprozine, the category for semi-professional magazines. As always, comments from previous FLCs have been incorporated into this list. Thanks for reviewing! --Pres N 16:45, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support You've turned these into a turnkey operation at this point. Hugo Awards FT in the future? Courcelles 22:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hopefully, though I'm a bit stuck on the "Best <person>" ones at the moment. --Pres N 00:19, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support - There are no disambiguation links and Checklinks gives it a clean bill of health. The prose is well written, succinct and to the point. From my perspective, it meets all the criteria for a Featured List. Great job as usual. --Dan Dassow (talk) 21:38, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Having seen all these lists, beginning to wonder if "World Science Fiction Society" is notable enough for an article now? After all, why have a bunch of FLs about awards given by a non-notable organisation?
- FYI: World Science Fiction Society redirects to Worldcon. Ironically, the Worldcon convention and the Hugo Award are probably more notible than the society which holds the convention and presents the award. --Dan Dassow (talk) 19:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
"and which has published four " seems an odd tense to me. But I am tired. Should it be "which had published four" (as the previous clause said "was given each year..")
"These five works on the ballot are the five most-nominated " do you absolutely need to repeat "five" here?
"Note that Thrust and Quantum are the same magazine" a bit picky but couldn't you expand on this a touch to say one became the other, or describe why two names are given to one publication?
Ref 11 needs an en-dash for the page range.

The Rambling Man (talk) 18:17, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- Done. --Pres N 18:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support as always. Sandman888 (talk) 13:33, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.