Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Hugo Award for Best Fan Artist/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 22:25, 14 March 2011 [1].
- Nominator(s): PresN 20:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Back into the breach with the 12th of 14 lists. The written works, magazines, editors, movies, and professional artists are done, so we now come to the Best Fan Artist award. Like the Professional Artist award, there's no mention of what works the artists in question worked on in the eligibility year; the award is simply noted as going to such-and-such. This list is basically identical to the Professional Artist list, but shorter and with different names. I've incorporated suggestions and changes from previous nominations into this list, as usual. Thanks for reviewing! --PresN 20:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Adabow (talk · contribs) 01:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comments
Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:51, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Weak support I have a few personal picks, but there are no major problems. Adabow (talk · contribs) 01:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Dab/EL check- One dab link and no dead links in the article. GamerPro64 (talk) 20:56, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed. --PresN 21:09, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Nothing wrong here, standard stuff by now. Courcelles 13:58, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 20:11, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 19:52, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support follows the formula, meets the criteria, nothing we can moan about! The Rambling Man (talk) 19:42, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
"though the 1954 Retro Hugos received insufficient nominations for the Fan Artist Hugo for make the ballot." Second "for" → "to". Note that this occurs in the lead and body.Winners and nominees: "Entries with a blue background and an asterisk next to the editor's name have won the award". Should "editor" be "artist" to match the award?Giants2008 (27 and counting) 01:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Done and done. --PresN 03:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.