Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Girls' Generation discography/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Hahc21 00:32, 23 July 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Girls' Generation discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 15:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I think I have brought it up featured list status by formatting it according to WP:DISCOGSTYLE and using several featured discographies as an example. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 15:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Underneath-it-All |
---|
;Comments
– Underneath-it-All (talk) 16:16, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support – Underneath-it-All (talk) 16:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Quite high quality. Minor point: Link in cite number 51 appears to be broken. — Cirt (talk) 18:46, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for noticing, I fixed it. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 20:31, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks better, thanks! — Cirt (talk) 21:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 13:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Quick comments (lead alone, will re-visit the tables and refs once these issues are resolved)
The Rambling Man (talk) 16:41, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Comment - my only issue is that some of the wikilinks actually point to articles on the Korean Wikipedia rather than the English one - is this usual practice.........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:47, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I have no idea. I thought it would be useful, because they don't have articles on the English wiki.Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 09:14, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. However, I suggest archiving other online sources with webcitation.org, to manually archive all online references which will guarantee they remain accessible even if the site goes down: (this page (step-by-step instructions there). SoapFan12 02:17, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
All caps in refs 8, 11, 28, 32, 47, 56, 58, 78, and 86 should be removed.These are fixed, but I also saw all caps in ref 27, which I missed earlier. This might as well be fixed too.Giants2008 (Talk) 22:08, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done.Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 14:11, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The hyphens in the titles of refs 9, 28 (2 of them), 32 (also 2), 37, 42, 43, 52, 78, and 85 should be converted into en dashes per the Manual of Style.Giants2008 (Talk) 22:07, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I've addressed all your concerns. Please let me know if there's any additional comments, thanks. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 05:51, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.