Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Game of Thrones (season 1)/archive2
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:30, 5 January 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Game of Thrones (season 1) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/Game of Thrones (season 1)/archive1
- Featured list candidates/Game of Thrones (season 1)/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Jclemens (talk) 22:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Despite improvements made during the previous nomination, this season article neither attracted any opposes nor supports. I've looked at the feedback given and addressed that which was actionable, and would appreciate either support, or further actionable feedback that I can correct. Thank you for your consideration. Jclemens (talk) 22:49, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - improvements made since previous FLC; I can't find any reason why this shouldn't be featured Spiderone 08:35, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - three of the paragraphs in the Production section end without a citation. I am assuming that the very next source in the next paragraphs include the content but you should fix this.--Deoliveirafan (talk) 19:38, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll review this. Jclemens (talk) 06:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- This has been addressed, with minimal addition of new sources (1), mostly just shuffling around things that were inline citations wlesewhere. Jclemens (talk) 21:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I would agree with the previous comment, that it's odd to just reference a couple of sentences in that whole section. Also, I think the lead is sub-optimal with four very short paras. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- What would you like to see different: fewer paragraphs, or more total content? Jclemens (talk) 06:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Absent any specific direction, I've tried to expand the lead a bit with appropriate and proportional content. Let me know if you were looking for something different. Jclemens (talk) 22:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Any reasons why only 5 countries are discussed in broadcast? Was it released worldwide in 2011? Nergaal (talk) 15:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll look into this. Jclemens (talk) 06:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- It was indeed, and I've reworked and expanded the section. Jclemens (talk) 21:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Great job! Support. But please do me a favor and write in words in the awards section the number of how many other noms and wins did the show have besides Emmys. Nergaal (talk) 08:39, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, it looks like the expanded info on worldwide broadcasters ran afoul of WP:TVINTL and has been reverted. Still looking into awards, but the challenge there is that the list we have is not exhaustive. Jclemens (talk) 18:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 22:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
- Support – I saw that the two uncited actors were removed from the list. As that was the last outstanding issue, all of my comments have now been resolved. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Passing Source review, and promoting. --PresN 12:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.