Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Family Guy (season 4)/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 23:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Family Guy (season 4) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/Family Guy (season 4)/archive1
- Featured list candidates/Family Guy (season 4)/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): 1989 (talk) 04:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I feel like this list is in good enough standing to become a FL. There was a peer review, and a former FL nomination regarding this list, and most of the problems have been addressed. 1989 (talk) 04:12, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Carbrera
|
---|
|
- Support – Good look in getting it promoted. Carbrera (talk) 00:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Aoba47
|
---|
@1989: Overall, the list looks very good and once my comments are addressed, I will look through it again and support it. Good luck with this nomination! Aoba47 (talk) 06:35, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support Great job with the list and good luck with getting it promoted in the future! If possible, could you look at my similar FLC for Private Practice (season 1). I understand if you do not have the time or interest to do this as it is a busy time of the year. Aoba47 (talk) 17:51, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from SNUGGUMS
|
---|
Oppose
This is certainly not FL quality at the moment, but I don't think it's beyond repair. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:37, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
|
Huge improvement! I made some minor tweaks, and now can support this nomination. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:41, 21 January 2017 (UTC) [reply]
Clarification about Requesting a Source Review
|
---|
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 07:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 10:04, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
|
Source review by Wehwalt
|
---|
Source review by Wehwalt[edit]
|
That's all I have. Looks good.--Wehwalt (talk) 11:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.