Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Bruno Mars discography/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 18:42, 6 December 2012 [1].
Bruno Mars discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Bruno Mars is a very successful singer-songwriter, who has sold 6 million albums and 40 million singles worldwide; with three of his singles being among the best-selling singles of all-time. We are nominating his discography to become a featured list because we feel that after our work on it, it now meets the FL criteria. Statυs (talk) and ΛΧΣ21™ 04:06, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from TBrandley (talk) 06:07, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Support TBrandley 06:08, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the support TB! Zac 07:15, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Although Bruno doesn't have much releases and this discography is small, it is well written, the tables are well organized and the references are in fine condition. Good job! — Tomica (talk) 16:57, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Tom! Zac 20:27, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply] | ||
---|---|---|
Comments with an oppose right now.... The Rambling Man (talk) 19:38, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from Till 01:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Oppose—
|
- Since you clearly can't make up your mind whether or not to want to support or oppose, your comments will be ignored from now on. Zac (talk · contribs) 22:51, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Let's keep the discussion calm, shall we? If issues have been pointed out, we most certainly aren't going to ignore them. I think the dashes are comfortable reading myself, but the others are worth addressing. Giants2008 (Talk) 18:06, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Everything have been fixed by now :) — ΛΧΣ21™ 18:41, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Let's keep the discussion calm, shall we? If issues have been pointed out, we most certainly aren't going to ignore them. I think the dashes are comfortable reading myself, but the others are worth addressing. Giants2008 (Talk) 18:06, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Anything new in this FLC? It has been opened for over a month and all issues have been fixed. — ΛΧΣ21™ 02:19, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 11:21, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
Conditional support, but I've noticed that the lines in the empty cells are not aligned centrally - they appear to actually aligned slightly to the right. Apart from that, this is very good. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 13:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Could you show a screenshot of such? It appears centered to me. Zac (talk · contribs) 17:50, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know where an appropriate place would be to upload a screenshot for such a small purpose. In any case (unless I'm seeing things), no matter what browser I try the lines do look aligned to the right (although only very slightly). An examination of the wikicode shows that instead of a space separating the pipe from the dash, there appears to be an NBSP instead. This makes the gap between the pipe and the cell slightly wider, shifting the lines out of position. Sorry for the delay in response. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 17:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm... I'm not actually sure why a NBSP was added to that. I don't recall it being there before. I will remove it. Statυs (talk) 22:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- A-ha! I see what you are talking about, I see it too. After taking a closer look. Statυs (talk) 22:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank goodness I'm not seeing things. In any case, as this has now been resolved I'll offer my support. Good job, as always! I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 18:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you! Statυs (talk) 15:23, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank goodness I'm not seeing things. In any case, as this has now been resolved I'll offer my support. Good job, as always! I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 18:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- A-ha! I see what you are talking about, I see it too. After taking a closer look. Statυs (talk) 22:20, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm... I'm not actually sure why a NBSP was added to that. I don't recall it being there before. I will remove it. Statυs (talk) 22:18, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know where an appropriate place would be to upload a screenshot for such a small purpose. In any case (unless I'm seeing things), no matter what browser I try the lines do look aligned to the right (although only very slightly). An examination of the wikicode shows that instead of a space separating the pipe from the dash, there appears to be an NBSP instead. This makes the gap between the pipe and the cell slightly wider, shifting the lines out of position. Sorry for the delay in response. I Am Rufus • Conversation is a beautiful thing. 17:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you show a screenshot of such? It appears centered to me. Zac (talk · contribs) 17:50, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments. —WP:PENGUIN · [ TALK ] 11:52, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments: There are some prose issues in the lead, as well as sourcing concerns. They're as follows:
|
- Support; Iz very good. AdabowtheSecond 15:20, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your support! Statυs (talk) 15:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The thing is I had been looking previously at this FL candidate, so decided to finally comment and most certainly deserves the star. AdabowtheSecond 18:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your support! Statυs (talk) 15:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:14, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*I don't see (maybe I'm just goin a bit batty) the 6M claim for the album represented in the given source.
|
- Support --CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:14, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Nathan! Statυs (talk) 15:20, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 02:14, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
- Per talk page request, I'll leave a review for this list by tomorrow. Best, Jonatalk to me 16:15, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Jona has 20 days without editing Wikipedia, so I'm afraid he won't be able to review the list.... — ΛΧΣ21™ 17:52, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Artist hasn't been around for that long but has two of the highest selling singles of all time and a multi-platinum album, so is of high relevance. Plus this article is very organized and easy to navigate through. Great work guys! Arre 05:42, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Arre! Statυs (talk) 13:14, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.