Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/79th Academy Awards/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:12, 4 May 2014 [1].
79th Academy Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Birdienest81 (talk) 03:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating the 2007 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I also followed how the 1929, 1989, 1990, 1992, 1994, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2009, 2010, 2012, and 2013 Oscars were written. Please note that some references were retrieved via Internet Archive.--Birdienest81 (talk) 03:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment "Winners are listed first and highlighted in boldface.[20]"—No they aren't...—indopug (talk) 04:15, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed: Changed to "Winners are listed first and indicated with a double-dagger (‡)."
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 00:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
- Support Looks good as usual. Reywas92Talk 19:02, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support All good! -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 07:15, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Great job, once again.--Jagarin 03:04, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Support Great list!--Earthh (talk) 14:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:45, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.