Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/40th Daytime Emmy Awards/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Hahc21 10:01, 10 January 2014 (UTC) [1].[reply]

40th Daytime Emmy Awards

Featured list candidates/40th Daytime Emmy Awards/archive1

Nominator(s): — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 12:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets the every single criteria. Also, I believe it to be well sourced and clear. After much tweaking and further adjustments I feel that it is worthy of being a Featured List. I believe this list is worthy, considering I worked on it with promoted Featured lists in mind. If you oppose, please address your issues here so they can be resolved. If you oppose, please address your issues here so they can be resolved. — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 12:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Birdienest81 (talk) 16:44, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

For the presenters and performers, awards as roles seems awkward. Add the phrase "Presenter(s) of the award for..." before each award. For example, with Erica Slezak's role, rename it as "Presenter of the award for Outstanding Drama Series"

Done. — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 05:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The table with the key dates seems unnecessary since the awards already has occurred. The Oscar ceremony lists and the 29th Golden Raspberry Awards does not have any list for key dates. I also do not think casual readers care about such technical aspects such as DVD's screeners and such. If you want to mention that stuff, I think it would be better served if the procedures and timeline of voting were presented in a paragraph format with prose. Otherwise, it should be dropped completely.

Done. — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 05:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily important, but maybe order the presenters by appearance from first to last (if possible).

Like you said, not necessairily important therefore did not add this. &Snbsp;— SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 05:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

--Birdienest81 (talk) 04:06, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support: The list looks really good. Well done.

--Birdienest81 (talk) 16:44, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:22, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

How can programs which won Emmy awards not even be linked?

Since, these programs do not have their own article and I would of linked them however due the FL criteria I did not wanted to have too many red links.

There won't be too many, but Emmy Award-winning television shows should be linked as inherently notable. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done.

″recognizes... strange quotation marks.

Done.

"the Beverly Hilton Hotel" is actually called "The Beverly Hilton".

Done, however do I still include the ″hotel″ part from "The Beverly Hilton"?

No need. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. — SoapFan12 (talk, contribs) 21:46, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No need to link major geographical entities like California.

Done.

A.J. Hammer -> A. J. Hammer.

Done.

"won the most awards, with a total of four wins" won... wins, "a total of", some redundancy in this sentence.

Done.

"the winner of the category is shown first" with a double-dagger. If you're going to explain that the winner comes first, then include the fact it comes with a double-dagger and dispense with the "key".