Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2009 WWE Draft/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 01:43, 10 May 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because... after working on it for about a week, I feel that I have met the criteria for featured lists. This is in a way based on its predecessor FL, but not entirely. Unlike the other FL, this is set up a bit different and I hope it is more comprehensible. It was copyedit by Mattisse and Nikki (thanks alot), so hopefully only few mistakes are found. Happy reviewing. Note: I don't think stability will be an issue since the event is completely over now, and will not be affected heavily by future events.--Truco 01:55, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I, Truco, am taking a semi-leave from Wiki at the time I'm typing this. Any further comments will be addressed by members of WP:PW. Thanks!--Truco 03:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from KV5 |
---|
Hope this helps. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 12:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A good-looking list. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 15:58, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support from KV5 (Talk • Phils) 16:20, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008
|
---|
Comments -
|
Support - Note that I made a sentence structure improvement myself before coming here. I was ready to support when I saw it, and figured it would be easy enough to fix it myself. Giants2008 (17-14) 02:22, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:23, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources
- What makes http://www.gerweck.net/ratings.htm reliable? Dabomb87 (talk) 02:06, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- They got their information from Nielsen Media Research.--Truco 01:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll leave this out for other reviewers to decide. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:23, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- They got their information from Nielsen Media Research.--Truco 01:42, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Would it be feasible to add embedded images in the tables? After all, a large portion of the wrestlers do have free images. -- Scorpion0422 21:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.