Wikipedia:Featured article review/USA PATRIOT Act, Title III, Subtitle A/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 02:19, 25 June 2009 [1].
FAR commentary
[edit]FA from 2006, referencing/1c issues (virtually all are primary sources, indicating WP:NOR problems). Additional issues as already raised here [2]. Cirt (talk) 03:04, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Even my last bit of legislation has more secondary sourcing than that, and no article should read as a play-by-play of the document it is describing. I also worry that there is an almost complete lack of inline citations, with some sections not having any at all. Ironholds (talk) 09:30, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- While we're on the subject, someone might want to check out the "Featured Article" Section summary of the USA PATRIOT Act, Title II, which is structured similarly to this article and probably should be reviewed as well. 98.166.139.216 (talk) 19:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Good point - I'm going to nominate that as well. Ironholds (talk) 22:00, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, original research, use of appropriate reliable sources (primary sources). Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources. YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) 04:56, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 05:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist lacking reliable references; ongoing merge discussion; unclear notability; multiple clean-up tags. DrKiernan (talk) 17:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.