Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article review/Turkish literature/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by Raul654 17:11, 1 February 2010 [1].

Turkish literature

[edit]

Review commentary

[edit]
Toolbox
Notified: All WikiProjects.Author is completely retired, no edits for 2.5 years.

This article fails 1c by a long way because many subjective statements ("Perhaps" etc) as well as entire paragraphs and sections are not cited. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (Invincibles Featured topic drive:one left) 20:41, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image review
  • File:Fuzuli Divan.jpg: the poetry is by Fuzuli, but the artwork is presumably by someone else. No date, author or description. Is this an image of an original sixteenth century copy or a nineteenth century one?
  • File:Ozan.jpg: upload source is a dead link. No author or original source.
  • File:Kaygusuz Abdal.jpg: source is a dead link. No author, date or description.
  • File:Ottoman Garden.jpg: the poetry is by Baki, but what of the artwork? Unclear date: is it from the sixteenth century or a later copy?
  • File:Fuzuli.jpg: no description, date, author or original source.
  • File:Evliya Celebi.jpg: source is a dead link. No description, date, author or original source.
  • File:Tevfik Fikret2.jpg: no author, date, or date of first publication.
  • File:Genc Kalemler.jpg: no date. The article says the journal started in 1911, but it doesn't say when it ended. Presumably the date is on the cover written in Turkish, so perhaps a Turkish speaker could look at the image and transcribe the date into english?
  • File:Orhan Pamuk3.jpg: I can't access any of the four sources given, including the web archive.
  • Other images OK, but alt text required, see WP:ALT for guidance.

On another note, the purpose of navigation templates is to provide links between related articles. On the templates here, half the links are red. They should either be stubbed or removed. If the writers are not notable enough to have an article, then they are notable enough to be on the template. DrKiernan (talk) 12:23, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Two references sections and a notes sections. Might want to regularise that. Also references, need more. Fifelfoo (talk) 10:04, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


FARC commentary

[edit]
FA criteria concerns are sourcing, copyright, alt text. YellowMonkey (bananabucket) (Invincibles finally at Featured topic candidates) 05:28, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delist - no work has been done to address the concerns listed at the FAR since that process was begun. Delist vote based mainly on lack of referencing - many claims, statistics, potentially controversial statistics are left without references. Other concerns include a lack of alt text and prose issues, such as number presentation. References are improperly formatted, with books and websites lacking publishers and foreign language references not having their language specified. Dana boomer (talk) 02:24, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question. Why was User:Saposcat never notified of this? The nominator says he hasn't edited in 2 and a half years--that is not true: he has edited every few months, most recently in April, and there's no reason to assume he doesn't watch his talk page. This FARC is premature; I will notfiy Saposcat now, but he should be given an opportunity to make improvements. Chick Bowen 18:11, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note. Tony (talk) 11:37, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/Turkish_literature/archive1&oldid=1089082298"