Wikipedia:Featured article review/Transit of Venus/archive2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 1:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: Anthony, WP Solar System, WP Astronomy, talk page notice 2021-02-05
Review section
[edit]This 2004 Featured article has not been maintained to current standards, and there has been no input since the notice in February 2021. In addition to issues noticed on 2021-02-05, there is considerably poor layout with MOS:SANDWICHing, large amounts of uncited text, and a prose tuneup is needed. There are no currently active editors in the article page stats; like most of the astronomy suite of FAs, this one appears to be untended. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:22, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC – refs are seriously lacking across large swaths of text; image placement needs work; prose needs to be reworked in places. There haven't been any substantive edits in months, which suggests that there's no one willing to fix these considerable issues. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:38, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC - In addition, will also suggest that the section for the 1761 and 1769 transits may need attention from a weighting perspective, as even what appear to be more minor observation groups are described in detail there, with much less detail going to other transits. Also, significant image work is needed - there's an image of an ancient clay tablet that isn't mentioned in the article at all. Hog Farm Talk 05:09, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include organization, prose and sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:12, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - No engagement, significant issues with sourcing and weighting remain. Hog Farm Talk 02:37, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist – no progress; substantial issues remain. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:51, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist no significant edits since nominated for FAR, issues still remain. Z1720 (talk) 14:48, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.