Wikipedia:Featured article review/Sydney Roosters/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 2:42, 6 November 2021 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: WP:AWNB, WP:RL, July 2021 notice
Review section
[edit]I am nominating this featured article for review because it has unsourced material, extreme recentism, material sourced to the club itself and unnecessary procedural details on club business, and an undue weight list of random celebrities who are fans of the club Bumbubookworm (talk) 11:34, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC – Yeah, this FA is clearly deficient. The tons of unreferenced content and recentist nature of the history section alone are enough for it to need serious work from someone with access to better sourcing for this topic than I possess. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Oddly, the totals at the bottom of the win-loss table do not match the sums of the numbers in the table. Hog Farm Talk 18:34, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC - uncited text, presence of various fancruft, extreme recentism, table that doesn't foot properly, etc. There are major deficiencies here. Hog Farm Talk 16:16, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include sourcing and coverage. Nikkimaria (talk) 16:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist I axed the list of notable supporters but the other problems mentioned above are still present. (t · c) buidhe 21:04, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- This edit has now been undone. I guess Runaround Stu wants the article to be delisted! (t · c) buidhe 21:20, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. Unsourced statements, paragraphs and sections. Sections formatted as lists not prose. DrKay (talk) 14:42, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - issues have not been addressed, and that weird table footing issue is bugging the crap out of me. Hog Farm Talk 04:48, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:42, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.