Wikipedia:Featured article review/Suzanne Lenglen/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed 19:31, 8 April 2007.
Review commentary
[edit]- Messages left at Jeronimo, Biography and France. LuciferMorgan 18:17, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No inline citations, only one very generic reference, too short lead, sub-FA prose level (one-sentence paragraphs)... would be B-level now. —Onomatopoeia 12:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Some inline references I have added. What I find missing in the article is mention of her influence on women tennis in terms of style, dressing sense and her media darling image. STTW (talk) 21:08, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments WP:LEAD is inadequate; WP:DASH review needed—incorrect use throughout; footnotes need publisher and author, publication date when available, and last access date on websources; the article has a lot of unattributed opinion. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:47, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Work needed per WP:LEAD, and the structure should be tweaked. Referencing is a problem. Ceoil 23:45, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing (1c), and LEAD (2a). Marskell 09:13, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per 1c. LuciferMorgan 09:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per 1c & 2a. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove no improvements to list of deficiencies above. (Gosh that's a long sig ahead of me :-)) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.