Wikipedia:Featured article review/Sherman Minton/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 4:33, 29 July 2023 (UTC) [1].

Sherman Minton

Notified: Mass Message Send notifications, talk page notice 2022-10-10

Review section

This 2011 FA has similar source-to-text integrity issues found in other articles from the same FAC nominator, which have not been addressed since the 2022-10-10 talk page notice. Because of the similar issues found in all other articles, I suggest a check of all offline sources will be needed if this article is to retain FA status. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:45, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Move to FARC~~, zero engagement. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:41, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Struck per EW, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:45, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Move to FARC~~ - nothing has happened yet. Hog Farm _Talk 13:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Struck per below. Hog Farm _Talk 14:13, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Move to FARC~~ no progress to address concerns. Z1720 (talk) 23:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per EW's comments below, I look forward to (hopefully) see this saved! Z1720 (talk) 12:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I went through a few paragraphs tonight verifying and rewriting (thankfully most of the sources are online). I think this might be saveable, but I'll have to go through and check/revise everything sentence by sentence, which will obviously take a while. Not sure whether I'll have the time to do all that, but I'll try—how about I give everyone a status update in a few weeks' time? Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:18, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Extraordinary Writ do you have a verdict yet? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:37, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
From what I've seen, it does still seem to be saveable: source-to-text integrity is a bit of a mess, but most of the issues don't take too long to fix (either by finding the right page number or just removing the claim altogether). I've been pretty busy recently but will try to make some more progress in the next couple of weeks. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Extraordinary Writ: SandyGeorgia (Talk) 12:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is still on my radar, but I've been fairly busy lately and haven't made much progress. I don't want this to linger in FAR forever, but I'm hoping to have more time available soon, so let's give it a few more weeks. If I still haven't gotten anything done by the end of the month, it might be best to go forward with delisting, at least for the time being. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:35, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

*Move to FARC per the comment above, no significant edits since May. Z1720 (talk) 19:06, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Move to FARC per EW comment (perhaps more improvements will happen in the next phase). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:38, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FARC section

Verifiability issues. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delist. This still needs a substantial amount of work, and I just haven't had the interest recently to get that work done. Apologies for dragging this out longer than it needed to be. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:59, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist, per EW. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 11:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per EW, no edits since May to the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:32, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per EW. Hog Farm _Talk 13:15, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:33, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.