Wikipedia:Featured article review/Perfect Dark/archive1
NOTE: This discussion has been moved to Talk: Perfect Dark per the admin's comments below. --Teancum (talk) 02:44, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Perfect Dark (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: CALR, Drat, Nick R, Niwi3, WikiProject Video games
I am nominating this featured article for review because of the following:
- Issues with specific references
- IMDB (unreliable source)
- detStar (notability not established)
- CheatCodesGuides.com (per WP:GAMETRIVIA)
- Yamo's Lair (notability not established)
- "The Rare Witch Project Wiki" (per WP:RS wikis cannot be used)
- moddb.com (unreliable source per Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources#Unreliable sources)
- The refs/links in general could use some looking over
- Issues with reference formatting in general. Format is not consistent, rarely lists authors of web articles, etc.
- Several dead links can be replaced, although admittedly there may be some that can't.
- Entire paragraphs under the Gameplay and Development sections are unsourced.
- The Reception section is poorly organized and lacking in content overall.
- File:Perfect Dark Japanese Ad.jpg, File:Goldeneye-in-perfect-dark.jpg too large per WP:NFCC.
- There's a direct external link which should be a wikilink in the article
- The article has an overuse of images per WP:NFCC. Not all images are needed to convey the game to the reader.
- Fair use rationale needs beefing up on most of the images
- Some image captions are simply "this is what you see in the image" rather than useful captions per WP:CAPTION
- There are several small paragraphs which can be merged
- There is no alt text on any of the images
I recommend a demotion to B-Class, as this doesn't pass Good article criteria either. --Teancum (talk) 02:26, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- There has been no pre-FAR talk page notification, as is required by a recent change to FAR procedure. Because of this, I am untranscluding the nomination from the FAR page and removing the template from the article talk page. Please make the notification and if there is no answer after at least a week feel free to retransclude the nomination and replace the template. Dana boomer (talk) 02:39, 29 November 2010 (UTC)