Wikipedia:Featured article review/Libertarianism/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed 14:11, 15 January 2007.
Review commentary
[edit]This article needs a cleanup/review of External links and See also. It also has an extensive list of References; it's not clear if all of these sources are used as references for the article, or if some should be Further reading and/or pruned. The article is undercited, with seven footnotes and a mixed reference style, in spite of the lengthy Reference list. The article is full of weasle words and uncited claims. There are external jumps, and a cleanup tag. Sandy (Talk) 01:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Per above. LuciferMorgan 03:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC - unimproved. Sandy (Talk) 01:14, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Suggested FA criteria concerns citation sufficiency and format (1c), weasel words (1d), general cleanup issues (2). Marskell 15:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove per Sandy's criteria concerns. LuciferMorgan 22:52, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove. Per Sandy's remarks and Lucifer. I also see a section tagged for clean-up.--Yannismarou 18:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove. Pity; seems to be well written, but Sandy's concerns are the clincher. Tony 07:28, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove Yes, too few citations for an article this size. Structure is another problem.UberCryxic 23:58, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.