Wikipedia:Featured article review/Jack Sparrow/archive2
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 2:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: Alientraveller, PNW Raven, Brojam, WikiProject Disney, WikiProject Piracy, WikiProject Film, WikiProject Fictional characters, talk page notice 2022-04-26
Review section
[edit]Since the 2015 Wikipedia:Featured article review/Jack Sparrow/archive1, this article has been left behind and was never watchlisted by editors or took care the article. The article has been outdated for some time, and there have been no updates or additional content added since the recent lawsuit. There are also several templates in other sections. The reception/cultural impact could be expanded a lot and maybe remove most of the listicles on that section. BloatedBun (talk) 10:43, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
DelistIt looks like this article just needs a little touching up, but as of right now it is definitely does not look like an FA. The lead is fine, but it mentions nothing about his reception. There are also 7 unreliable sources used, which includes Imbd, International Business Times, and goodreads. There is also a post 2013 Newsweek and Allmovie ref as well as a dead link. I also think there are way too many primary sources, but I didnt look into where they are being used. The characters section looks pretty good except for when it is not even talking about the and is talking about the movie such as thisOn Stranger Tides was first announced on September 28, 2008, during a Disney event at the Kodak Theatre. Verbinski did not return to direct the fourth installment and was replaced by Rob Marshall. The movie uses elements from Tim Powers' novel of the same name, particularly Blackbeard and the Fountain of Youth, but the film is not a straight adaptation of the novel. The fifth film, Dead Men Tell No Tales, was co-directed by Joachim Rønning and Espen Sandberg.
I think the Johhny Depp section is good as well as the make-up and costumes section. The film section seems to be fine. I don't think the stuff like this in characterization needs to be saidwhich compels the admiration of Lieutenant Groves as he concedes: "That's got to be the best pirate I have ever seen". Norrington himself acquiesces to this praise: "So it would seem", in sharp contrast to what he had previously proclaimed: "You are without doubt the worst pirate I have ever heard of".
, but that might just be me. The part in characterization where it talks about what Jack was based off and inspired by needs to go in concept and creation. The second paragraph in reception and impact on pop culture looks good, but the first one is just mainly listicles. In other media seems to be fine unless it can really be expanded. That is just my quick overview of the articlewhich has lead me to an unfortunate delist. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 12:32, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]- Kaleeb18 please see the instructions at WP:FAR; Keep or Delist are not declared at this stage. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:36, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- SandyGeorgia oh oops. thanks for telling me. I guess I did not thoroughly read the message at WikiProject Disney and thought we were already on that stage. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 15:38, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Kaleeb18 please see the instructions at WP:FAR; Keep or Delist are not declared at this stage. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:36, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC issues haven't been addressed (t · c) buidhe 17:14, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC no significant progress to address comprehensive concerns. Z1720 (talk) 01:00, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC issues identified remain unaddressed. Hog Farm Talk 01:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section include currency, sourcing, and structure. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:34, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, issues unaddressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:15, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, unaddressed. Femke (talk) 20:51, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, issues unaddressed. Hog Farm Talk 18:14, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist some small edits have been made, but nothing significant and nothing that addresses the identified issues. Z1720 (talk) 03:32, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 02:43, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.