Wikipedia:Featured article review/History of Portugal (1777–1834)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 02:33, 6 July 2009 [1].
Review commentary
[edit]- Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Portugal, User:Joaopais, User:AndyZ, and User:Cherry blossom tree.
A 2006 FA, not meeting current FA criteria. Poorly written Lead (2a), Lack of Inline citations (1c). KensplanetTC 15:58, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Though surely public domain, File:MariaIPortugal.jpg, File:Miguel of Portugal.jpg, File:Andremassena1.jpg, and File:Duque da Terceira.jpg are missing sources/authors. File:Duke of Wellington 2.jpg is missing a source.
The license of File:Lines of Torres Vedras.jpg (I release it to the public domain) does not match the original upload log (Free image made by the municipality of Torres Vedras (source: http://www.cm-tvedras.pt/monumentos/imagens/linhas_copy.jpg)).
Just on an aesthetic note, there seem to be a lot of images of very similar men wearing very similar uniforms and very similar decorations in very similar poses. Do they really add anything to the understanding of the subject matter? Shouldn't images be more varied? DrKiernan (talk) 16:53, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, lead, copyrights. Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources. YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) paid editing=POV 02:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 11:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist: Issues not resolved. KensplanetTC 13:34, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist inline citations required for statements "stormy", "unbalanced", "world's first restraining order", "is also reported..." among many others. DrKiernan (talk) 17:25, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.