Wikipedia:Featured article review/Eifel Aqueduct/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by User:Marskell 11:34, 26 August 2008 [1].

Eifel Aqueduct

Review commentary

Notified WP Germany and WP Architecture, principle editor no longer active.

A 2004 promotion, this article is lacking citations and needs a MOS tuneup and images check. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Untouched since nominated, move to FARC. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary

Suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing (1c), MoS (2), and images (3). Marskell (talk) 13:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In my view, the only suspect image is Image:Logo roemerkanal wanderweg.jpg, which may come under the guidance at Wikipedia:Logos. DrKiernan (talk) 13:21, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When the article first came up for review, I searched my architecture and ancient history books for references and found none. The web seems to have nothing either, although my searching talents are pathetically lacking as I am a book person. Could it possibly have a more common alternative name? —Mattisse (Talk) 17:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
One hit on Google Books for "Eiffel Aqueduct",[2] nine for "Eifel Aqueduct".[3] Jappalang (talk) 22:27, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per lack of citations. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Remove, very few citations. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 04:42, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.