Wikipedia:Featured article review/Brown Dog affair/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was kept by User:Joelr31 16:06, 12 July 2008 [1].
The article is subject to a constant, months-long edit war regarding inclusion of external links. Therefore, the article fails criterion 1e) Stability and should be delisted as a featured article. Sceptre (talk) 12:16, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- An edit war over an external link doesn't seem to be enough to warrant a FAR.--Peter Andersen (talk) 15:12, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed - this is a frivolous nomination. If you have actual concerns, please bring them up - I, for one, can find a few problems with the prose here and there, but nothing to warrant de-featuring. Nousernamesleft (talk) 22:55, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Featured articles are expected to not be subject to edit wars. This article is. One which has lasted at least three weeks, may be going back even more. Sceptre (talk) 23:15, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed - this is a frivolous nomination. If you have actual concerns, please bring them up - I, for one, can find a few problems with the prose here and there, but nothing to warrant de-featuring. Nousernamesleft (talk) 22:55, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.