Wikipedia:Featured article review/Blue whale/archive1
There are many problems with this article:
It isn't factually accurate, contradicting itself and being tagged with {{contradict}}.It is not well referenced, with several places tagged with {{fact}} and only one in-line citation in the "Notes" section.Its "Physical description" section does not have a single image to illustrate it.Many objections brought up by multiple people on its talk page have not been addressed.
-- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Nomination withdrawn. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- May 2005 FAC
- Dec 2005 Contradicting numbers introduced here and here
- April 2006 Contradicting numbers discussed
- No request for inline citations or illustrations
- I cited a population estimate and removed the contradiction tag. I also converted an ext.link in the body into a footnote. --maclean25 08:05, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Please see the guidelines that call for specifying the article's deficiencies on the talk page. I don't see any objections on the talk page that aren't resolved, but if you do, highlight them again. I'm removing this listing to give a chance for any issues to be handled on the article's talk page. - Taxman Talk 18:25, 19 April 2006 (UTC)