Wikipedia:Featured article review/Algerian Civil War/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was removed by Marskell 17:27, 12 August 2009 [1].
WikiProjects notified
Review commentary
[edit]This article fails 1c due to a strong lack of citations and is not formatted consistently. It also fails BLP because a lot of the unsourced information is about the complicity of current warlords/terrorists/politicians in dubious activities like rape/slavery/fraud/terrorism etc. YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) paid editing=POV 02:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Images need alt text as per WP:ALT. Eubulides (talk) 07:33, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, alt text. Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources. FAQ? YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) paid editing=POV 01:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 04:42, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per myself YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) paid editing=POV 07:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - needs many more citations to retain the star. —Ed (Talk • Say no to drama) 19:38, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - per above and difficulty in assessing whether it is NPOV. —Mattisse (Talk) 18:35, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per Yellow's concerns. This article strongly violates BLP and is potentially libelous. At the very least, massive numbers of citations need to be added. I also have some concerns about NPOV and adequate coverage. JKBrooks85 (talk) 09:57, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.