Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Nella Larsen
- Article is no longer a featured article.
No sources. 20:49, Oct 24, 2004 (UTC)
- OK, having read again, reluctantly, remove for the reasons set out above and below. -- ALoan (Talk) 14:58, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Neutral - not the best, but not awful either. Peer review, perhaps? (although I suppose that a featured article that needs peer review ought not to be featured...) -- ALoan (Talk) 10:47, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC) - Support removal. It's certainly a decent article, but it's clearly below current standards. It'd be nice to see - and I don't think it'd be too hard for someone to do so - this improved to that standard. Until then, though, remove. Ambi 11:09, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Support removal. No lead section, no references. Some one sentence paragraphs. This is one of those excuse articles, "well if ... is featured and doesn't have ... why does this article have to?" - Taxman 13:12, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Support removal for reasons given by others. Is it just me, or does anyone else think that spoiler warnings in this context are daft. If someone is reading up about a writer, they probably want to know what that writer wrote about, and how they did it. Filiocht 13:58, Nov 1, 2004 (UTC)