Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Xenogears Original Soundtrack/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 19:38, 19 December 2009 [1].

Xenogears Original Soundtrack

[edit]
Nominator(s): Kariteh (talk) 22:47, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox

I am nominating this for featured article because I think it meets all the criteria. It covers all aspects of the soundtrack's creation and also touches on broad subjects ranging from the original game to Bulgarian choirs and comparisons with Celine Dion. Kariteh (talk) 22:47, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments, leaning Oppose on 1c by an odd name—various points.

  • Images need alt text.
  • The music4games link is dead (gives a short error message); otherwise, no dab links or dead external links.
  • Ref dates are all ISO style (full) or Month Year (partial).
    • I didn't say you had to change all the dates to Month Day, Year, but that works as well. (It also blends nicely with the article's Month Day, Year style.) Dates throughout look good. --an odd name 00:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • 1c issues (verifiability etc.):
    • What makes Square Enix Music Online a high-quality reliable source? The site's "About Us" page doesn't convince me much—the "We're Hiring!" page actually un-convinces me ("Experience isn't required, but passion is essential!")—and it's being used for interviews with living people like Yasunori Mitsuda.
    • Same question with ref 1 and its source site "Noisycroak". They both need to be HQ reliable. Never heard of either one until now, and (except for a list of editors on the former) I see nothing to go by. I am *clears throat* glad to see Bayonetta on their front page, but that doesn't excuse 1c for me, no no. (added on 23:53, 30 November 2009 (UTC))
  • From the second image's page: "This image is used on various websites, so its use on Wikipedia does not make it significantly more accessible than it already is."—I loathe seeing text like this on non-free use rationales, because it is irrelevant to whether the image can be used on the English WP. Usage by many places doesn't excuse copyright violation, but it does make the lawyers look for more targets. I've removed it there. (I'm not saying the image itself is a copyvio.)
  • "the first ending song to ever appear in a game developed by Square"—as in the first ending theme in a Square game with sung lyrics? (There's been numerous ending themes in Square games before then, so I'm guessing that.)
  • For the next time you submit an article (this or any other), consider peer review or an A-class assessment from the WikiProject to make sure you're close to the criteria before nomination, even if you think so. Good Article doesn't mean much here—its criteria are lower and the reviewers fewer (and stretched thin), so both fundamental and FA-level problems slip past. (added on 00:50, 1 December 2009 (UTC))

--an odd name 23:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose on sources What makes these reliable?

Normally, if it was used for only a singular citation, I'd lean slightly reliable, but this forms about half the ref list. Has this website been used by reliable and notable third-party sources?

RB88 (T) 19:57, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image review: Three images:

Ive added a better fair use to that image now. Salavat (talk) 01:19, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • File:Xenogears OST limited.jpg: Alternative album cover (fair use), used as secondary infobox image. Appears to fail standard (see also comment by Fuchs above). Take a look at a music recording article recently promoted to FA that includes two fair use infobox images: Remain in Light (where the secondary image is of the album's back cover). In that case, it is immediately evident that the content of the secondary image is significantly different from the content of the main image. In that case, as well, the content of the secondary image is discussed in the article—it is worthy of critical commentary largely because it was originally intended for the front cover. In the case of this alternative album cover, its content does not appear to be significantly different from that of the primary album cover and it is not the subject of critical commentary. (As above, the rationale is also lacking, but this seems a moot point.)
  • File:Yasunori Mitsuda.jpg: Verified Commons image. No problem.—DCGeist (talk) 02:42, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Xenogears_Original_Soundtrack/archive1&oldid=1138475928"