Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Victoria Wood As Seen On TV/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 00:02, 30 January 2008.
I'm nominating this as a Featured Article as I believe it meets the FA criteria. It has been passed as A-class by Wikiproject Television who said "It comprehensive, well structured and well written. In its current state I'd be more than happy to support it at FAC"... Bingo99 (talk) 07:06, 22 January 2008 (UTC) Nominator bingo99, 22 January 2008, 07:05 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment—Some minor concerns I see right away:
- Too much boldface.
- Too many single-sentence paragraphs, including in the lead section.
- Some of the humor may not translate well (outside the UK). What does "ten minutes longer and I've splashed out on a new bra" mean, for example?
- Use of hyphens instead of em-dashes. Also there are spaced em-dashes; the spaces should be removed.
- What is a "northern couple"?
- Most of the images (Image:Marjeryandjoan.jpg, Image:Kitty1986.jpg, Image:Susieblake.jpg, Image:Onthetrolley.jpg, Image:Gailandcarl.jpg, Image:Ena Sharples Parody.jpg, Image:Walterswaitress.jpg and Image:Acorn1985.jpg) are missing a "Fair use rationale" for this article.
- Overall though it seems pretty decent and may be close to FA quality.—RJH (talk) 19:11, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—1c.
- Please minimise the use of bold face in the main text, apart from the very opening.
- Some of the references look dodgy. Ref 41, for example: who is the author? Why should we trust it? Ref 49 looks very unauthoritative. Needs a thorough audit of the refs. Tony (talk) 10:04, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.