Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ursula Franklin/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 02:18, 24 January 2009 [1], but was reopened by SandyGeorgia on 13:01, 26 January 2009.
I'm nominating this article for featured article because it recently received GA status and after some further editing, I feel it meets the FA criteria for completeness, quality of writing, etc. Bwark (talk) 18:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I corrected the spaced emdashes, WP:MOS#Captions need attention to puncutation, and I put in a request to User:Brighterorange to run his script to correct the faulty dashes in the citations. (I do not know where to categorize this article at WP:FA if it passes, it seems to fit in at least four categories.) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:31, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I would categorize this article broadly as "culture and society" but I realize categories are often narrower than that. For example, I see that the feature article on Harold Innis I worked on over the last year is categorized narrowly as "business, economics and finance." That may be because Innis was a professional economist (economic historian actually). Ursula Franklin is a professional metallurgist and research physicist, but I'd say her main contributions are philosophical or sociological ones and the article reflects that. Hope that helps. Bwark (talk) 12:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Bwark, we rely should get the proof of that GFDL release of File:Ursula Franklin book cover.jpg properly verified per Wikipedia:Image use policy#Free licenses. Please forward a copy of the release to permissions-en@wikimedia.org as described on Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission#When permission is confirmed. Thanks. --Sherool (talk) 23:12, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have forwarded the e-mail dated July 22, 2008 from the publishing company granting permission for use of the photo of the book cover. Bwark (talk) 01:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Great, thanks. --Sherool (talk) 15:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Permissions has granted an OTRS ticket for this image. Bwark (talk) 19:13, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Just checking out the lead, found this:
- She is the author of The Real World of Technology based on her 1989 Massey Lectures - which is based...
- Please, could you leave a note at my talk page reminding me to come back and fully review this article? Thanks, ₪Ceran →(cheer→chime →carol) 00:19, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have corrected the grammatical error in the lead that you pointed out. Many thanks. I have also left the requested note on your talk page. Bwark (talk) 21:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose - Until comments are resolved:
Career:
- She spent the rest of the war repairing bombed buildings - helping to repair, or designing repairs, what did she do?
- I have clarified this by adding "helping to repair" which is more accurate. Bwark (talk) 21:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- she - occurs too many times throughout article, needs varied SS
- I have eliminated many of these pesky pronouns, partly be restructuring sentences. Bwark (talk) 23:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- She did post-doctoral studies at the University of Toronto (U of T) and worked for 15 years at the Ontario Research Foundation. - completed p-d studies...
- I have replaced "did" with "completed" as suggested. Bwark (talk) 21:37, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Franklin was also active in the Voice of Women (VOW), now the Canadian Voice of Women for Peace. - it's kind of obvious, but could you briefly explain what this is?
- I have added a fuller explanation. Bwark (talk) 23:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The ref with 'for more information' needs to be correctly formatted - no, for more info
- I eliminated the entire footnote as superfluous. Bwark (talk) 23:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I will come back after these are resolved. Ceran→→ 15:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Sources look good. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.