Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Transformers: Dark of the Moon/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was not promoted by SandyGeorgia 16:08, 24 January 2012 [1].

Transformers: Dark of the Moon

Nominator(s): Fanaction2031 (talk) 04:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured article because I believe this article contains most of the information the film requires, and it doesn't really have any more errors. It contains a good amount of pictures, and contains relevant information. Fanaction2031 (talk) 04:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I queried the WP:VPT, and the colon in the title is confusing the tool.[2] Article stats: [3] Confusion moved to talk; other items in the toolbox will need to be check by hand. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Source review - spotchecks not done. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Be consistent in whether you notate web sources using website names or base URLs - compare for example the first two Collider refs
What makes this a high-quality reliable source? This? This? This? This? This? This? This? This? This? This?
Don't notate titles in all-caps
FN 27: retrieval date?
- Done. Fanaction2031 (talk) 00:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
FN 34, 35, 36: publisher?
- Halfway done. Fanaction2031 (talk) 00:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fn 39: formatting. Also, could you cite the original source for this instead?
- Original source can't be found. Fanaction2031 (talk) 00:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Check formatting of quotes within quotes in titles
- Will do the rest tomorrow. Fanaction2031 (talk) 00:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Check for consistency in wikilinking
- Will do the rest tomorrow. Fanaction2031 (talk) 00:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Look for minor inconsistencies like doubled periods
- Will do the rest tomorrow. Fanaction2031 (talk) 00:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
{{dl}} needs to be addressed. This is tagged as a private video
- Will do the rest tomorrow. Fanaction2031 (talk) 00:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
www.legend3-d.com returns an error message
- Fixed. Fanaction2031 (talk) 00:19, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - stopping halfway through the refs, too many appear to be questionable. Nikkimaria (talk) 22:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Numerous queries about reliability of sources have been raised, and there has been no response from the nominator in over a week. This nomination will have a better chance if it returns once sourcing concerns have been addressed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:06, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.