Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Supernature (Goldfrapp album)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted 01:10, 7 July 2007.
This article about Goldfrapp's most recent album is already listed as a good article and has been through two peer reviews. I think that this article is ready now, and I hope you agree. -- Underneath-it-All 23:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as nominator -- Underneath-it-All 16:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Could you please add references for the release dates (under the Format section) and also for the Credits and personnel? Nishkid64 (talk) 23:23, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I've added a reference under the credits and personnel section. Reference #30 covers everything contained in the table under formats, including the release dates. -- Underneath-it-All 23:42, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It does? When I checked that reference out, I could find nothing about release dates there. All I could find was information on the formats. Nishkid64 (talk) 15:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I have now added individual citations for each format. These citations cover the month and year of release plus the cat. number and country that it was released in. -- Underneath-it-All 16:22, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It does? When I checked that reference out, I could find nothing about release dates there. All I could find was information on the formats. Nishkid64 (talk) 15:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - all issues resolved
Comment Almost at support level. I just did a copy-edit, but there are some issues with citing critics that I'd like to see resolved first.
- Please be very precise when summarizing critical opinion. If you say that a song was well-received "by critics", you should either cite more than one positive review, or cite a single review that also states that other critics liked the album. The easiest way to fix this is to go through the article and re-check each sentence that mentions critical opinion against these criteria. You may also find the site Metacritic to be useful for supporting summaries of critical opinion.
Please double-check that all reviews are from staff writers of their respective publications. At least one cited review—ref name "bbc1"—is from a web-site member on BBC's web page, and shouldn't be used.- Merzbow 05:30, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I have gone through the article and have cited, where needed, multiple reviewers opinions to support claims that songs, etc. were well received. I have also checked the people reviewing the releases and removed the reference "bbc1" and replaced it. -- Underneath-it-All 17:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The caption for "Satin Chic" should probably be reworded. Songs generally aren't influenced by instruments; they use them. ShadowHalo 03:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed it. -- Underneath-it-All 04:15, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Sorry I forgot to throw in my support at the FAC earlier. All the concerns I had are now resolved. It looks like a nicely-written article. Nishkid64 (talk) 17:58, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks! -- Underneath-it-All 16:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.