Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Super Mario 3D Land/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 27 September 2024 [1].


Nominator(s): ๐šˆ๐š˜๐šŸ๐š (๐š๐šŠ๐š•๐š”๐šŸ๐š) 20:15, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating the Super Mario 3D Land article for Featured Article status because it is a well-written, comprehensive, and well-sourced piece that stands out as a high-quality representation of gaming content on Wikipedia. The article thoroughly covers all significant aspects of the game, including its development history, gameplay mechanics, release, and reception. It is well-sourced, and is currently at GA status. Thank you. ๐šˆ๐š˜๐šŸ๐š (๐š๐šŠ๐š•๐š”๐šŸ๐š) 20:15, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:FAC: "Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article before nominating it". Considering that you've made 0 edits to this article, did not consult with major contributors to the article, and your FAC nomination was reverted on the talk page, you should reconsider this nomination if you are not familiar with the subject and its sources. Vacant0 (talk โ€ข contribs) 20:28, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose from NegativeMP1

[edit]

Per the concerns posted by Vacant, it is pretty apparent that this is a drive-by. I also wouldn't say it "stands out as a high-quality representation of gaming content on Wikipedia" when there's writing issues I would personally not even allow at a GA level (one-two sentence paragraphs, reception section based more on headlines / game ratings rather than what critics actually had to say about the game, etc.). I recommend you withdraw this nomination. ฮป NegativeMP1 23:26, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest withdrawal - both procedurally and content-wise, this isn't where it needs to be. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.