Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Super 14/archive1

Quality article. Can't see any reason why it can't be a Featured Article.Narrasawa 10:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Huge Lack of referencing. Especially in the history...And None in the records section. Also 3 sections consist of just 1 paragraph, and a lot of paragraphs consist of just 2 sentances. Finally, summarise the lists into paragraphs. Great Article, interesting read, but not Featured Standard. Todd661 12:14, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. per Todd661, Rlevse 15:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Todd661. Also, images lack fair use rationale, sections with only one paragraph, and prose problems such as "The best four teams, finishing in the top four places..." (redundant) and "The semi-finals are contested to decide the two finalists, which is played" (the finalists is played?) Pagra shtak 15:01, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, I rushed into this nomination. It should be withdrawn, as there is a lot of work to do.Narrasawa 17:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]