Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Sri Lanka Army/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 4 July 2020 [1].
- Nominator(s): 49lk (talk) 04:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
This article is about Sri Lanka Land Defense force, Sri Lanka Army. I think that all the criteria needed for an FA, include in this article. So I believe it should featured. 49lk (talk) 04:16, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Oppose from Harrias
[edit]I suggest this this nomination is immediately withdrawn. The article is not ready, and the nominator is not a major contributor to the article. Some quick, and major issues:
- Large parts of the article are completely unreferenced.
- Those sources that are used are inconsistently formatted.
- Those sources that are used frequently include raw htmls, and omit author details and dates.
- There is inappropriate use of bold text, particularly in the "Training" section.
- The prose is not a the required quality for Featured content.
Long story short, this article is nowhere near consideration for Featured status. Harrias talk 08:05, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Oppose from Gog the Mild
[edit]Per Harrias, who beat me to it. I have just (re-)assessed the article as C class for MilHist. Gog the Mild (talk) 08:26, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Coord note
[edit]Hi, lack of editor involvement is enough for a procedural close but if you want to pursue this and actually delve into the article to improve it, suggest you take it through GAN and then MilHist A-Class Review before considering another run at FAC. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:37, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Ian Rose (talk) 08:37, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.