Great Show, Great Article. Detailed Article, and has sources cited and deserves to be a featured article for meeting criteria. FireSpike23:31, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comments: I'll withhold a vote for now, but have a few issues which need to be addressed. All screenshots and other fair use images need fair use rationales, and please get rid of the funny lines used as dividers in the characters section. More problems will probably surface with others too. Tell me, has the article undergone a peer review? Harro500:31, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The structure of the article needs work. "Overview" is just too general. The lead, if anything, is the overview. A more logical and informative section hierarchy is needed.
"Memorable incidents" is pure trivia and doesn't even belong in a sub-article as far as I'm concerned.
"Product placement" is not unique to the show and I don't see why it should require separate treatment, let alone a whole section.
"Music" and "Awards" are merely over-specific lists sprinkled with prose.
"Criticism" seems to be merely fan opinions with plenty of weasely "some"s in it. Summarize this quite brutally and insert into a history of the show (or something like it). And the opinions of a general audience and critics, not fandom, is what should be focused on.
