Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Royal Albert Hall/archive1

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamale (talk • contribs) 09:03, 29 March 2006

Oppose. No references, no internal photos. Batmanand | Talk 10:10, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for no refs/inline citation and lots of listed text (rather than prose). I'd love to see internal photos, but they aren't a requirement IMO. Staxringold 13:59, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Rather than having an "Introduction" section, think of incorporating this information into the lead section – after all, introducing the subject is what they're for. Also, more information on the architecture would be helpful – the second paragraph of the redundant Introduction section would be a good starting point. – HAM 14:51, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Lack of references, lead does not comply with WP:LEAD, there are serious structural/organisational issues and it is certainly not comprehensive ("Now the hall is used as a live music venue."??) Mikker ^(...) 00:32, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]