Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Resident Evil/archive1

Resident Evil

A great article that is featured article worthy.Blind14 23:06, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Support great article Blind14 23:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: FAC isn't a vote, it is a process of consensus formation. Therefore, the nominator adding "strong support" (or any support at all) is entirely superfluous. Mikker ^(...) 01:40, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where did this come from? I never said FAC was a vote.I just gave my opinion like everyone else.It seems like you're jumping to conclusions. Blind14 23:21, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nominators don't support or object. If I jumped to conclusion, I apologise. Mikker ^(...) 00:02, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: the lead is very bad (see WP:LEAD) & it, together with a good deal of the rest of the article, is overlinked (see WP:CONTEXT). (Why link success for example?). There are no spoiler warnings, "Story" seems to be entirely OR, the references, while okay, aren't comprehensive enough and perhaps relies too much on one source (IGN.com). Additionally, the second half of the article is extremely list heavy (please convert at least some of this to prose) and several of the pictures used seem to lack adequate licensing. Mikker ^(...) 01:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Images lack fair use rationale. Pagra shtak 03:30, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment footnotes go at end of sentences not in the middle. Rlevse 10:05, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Are all those game covers really needed? I can't say I'm a huge fan of the contents table being indented like that either, it squashes the text between the image together. Sunrise06 11:30, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Not yet. Short lead and apparently invalid ISBNs, the illustrations are focused mainly on the video game covers. --Brand спойт 11:35, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object Short lead, some stubby subsections, and way too many lists for an article hoping to become featured.UberCryxic 15:15, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object Not featured material yet I believe.I really dislike the number and length of the lists on this page. SOADLuver 22:46, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]