Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Raiders of the Lost Ark/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 00:18, 29 March 2008.
Nominator. I'm nominating this article for featured article because I think this article meets all of the criteria for promotion to FA status. It is well-written and researched and represents an important milestone in the history of cinema. J.D. (talk) 13:51, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Alientraveller 246 (notified)
- The Wookieepedian 57
- ColdFusion650 55
- Dark Kubrick 44
- Mrwojo 23
- Raiderss 15
- J.D. 13
Maralia (talk) 15:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)
- Firstly, checked the links, there are some dead ones, here.
- Should you refer to Indy? His nickname isn't introduced, and perhaps it's a little unencyclopaedic anyway...
- Any reason why the screengrabs are different sizes?
- Jones' or Jones's - be consistent.
- Where Magnum P.I. finishes a sentence, in the lead you have another full stop, in the article you don't. Be consistent again.
- Don't overlink Star Wars.
- "was the exact same location" - exact is redundant here.
- "cast & crew" - cast and crew.
- Could link to specific Academy award articles.
- Page ranges in the citations need to use the en-dash, not hyphen.
Hope these comments are of use. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose
- The nominator is not a major contributor and thus unlikely to be able "to respond positively to constructive criticism and to make an effort to address objections promptly".
- This article is simply not FAC-ready. It requires a close copy-edit by a good copy-editor:
- to get the English to a professional level;
- to ensure MoS compliance; and
- to reduce the huge amount of trivia masquerading as encyclopedic content.
- Examples
- Strange capitalisation: Army intelligence, Ark, Staff
- Measures and conversions: "A fibreglass boulder 22 feet in diameter" > "22 ft (7 m) ; "the boulder run by 50ft" > 50ft (16 m)"; "a 12-inch doll" > "12-inch (16 cm)". Also need standardizing.
- Currency: "$20 million (USD)" > "US$20 million"
- Dashes: the choice is unspaced emdashes or spaced endashes. This uses spaced emdashes ("We didn't do 30 or 40 takes — production; usually only four").
- Ampersand: "Several members of the cast & crew fell ill"
- Missing hyphens: "under cranked", "double exposed", "a 100 page".
- Superfluous hyphens: "by the second-unit who"
- Ellipses: no spaces between points
- Trivia: "Several members of the cast & crew fell ill; Rhys-Davies in particular defecated in his costume"; "An amateur shot-for-shot remake was made by Chris Strompolos, Eric Zala and Jayson Lamb, etc"; "Unlike the character he portrayed, Ford does not actually have a fear of snakes; Spielberg was not afraid either".
- --ROGER DAVIES talk 08:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I assure you the fan remake is hardly trivial:
- Variety
- Austin Chronicles
- Wired
- Village Voice
- The Guardian
- Minnesota Public Radio
- The New York Sun
- Indie Wire
- The Age
- Time Out
- Archaeology News
- Pop Matters
- The Observer
- Alientraveller (talk) 17:38, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.