Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Moscone-Milk assassinations/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 03:23, 12 April 2007.
I am nominating this article because this event has a role in history and not a lot of people know about the assassinations that well and I think it shoul be featured. I also think it is written well and this article has had a peer review and has improved since the review. --Gndawydiak 07:38, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - you're right, it is an interesting topic and from a very brief skim the prose looked ok, but it needs a 2 para lead which summarises the article and more than 3 inline refs. I might get a chance to look at the prose later. cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 10:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- .......actually, from looking at the prose it looks a little informal in places too. It would be great to get someone to give it a copyedit. I actually think it will require quite a bit of work to make it through this FA. Sorry....cheers, Casliber | talk | contribs 10:16, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Oppose. Not nearly ready. Basically uncited (in spite of a wealth of sources available), not comprehensive, and needs prose work. I suggest citing the article and then approaching WP:GAC. Then another peer review before approaching FAC again. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:37, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You sure about recommending GAC Sandy? Some people have been waiting more than a month for their articles to be reviewed. Anyhow, this articles does need work, so I oppose. LuciferMorgan 06:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose There are no references. --thedemonhog talk contributions 17:11, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. Still needs more work. Zedla 22:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.