Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Manchester United F.C./archive2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted 20:59, 20 March 2007.
The article is very well written. Very intresting, and of a very notable worldwide football club. Retiono Virginian 17:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Previous nomination here. Oldelpaso 19:13, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose too many sections, bold text, poor layouting, single sentence sections, poor inline referencing, list material. Some more pictures would be helpful too. =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:32, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per Nichalp. Gran2 20:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose needs lots of work such as embedded references for a start. Get it to "Good Article" first.--The Negotiator 21:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose a bit better than the article when it had its first FAC four months ago, but most of the same reasons still apply, particularly too recentist, not well-cited enough, staccato prose and too much listcruft. Qwghlm 00:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Lack of proper referencing, too many lists and lack of pictures (I would have thought that a picture of a recent game from a spectator would be in there for sure!) Harryboyles 04:11, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Still not up to scratch (and I'm meant to be helping improve it). Darkson - BANG! 09:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.