Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy/archive2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by Karanacs 15:08, 30 January 2009 [1].
- Support as nominator I feel this article at this time meets the FA criteria. It is a good article on the controversy and the subsequent aftermath. --Pstanton (talk) 01:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose I spot plenty of unformatted references. Also, have you contacted the article's main contributors first before submitting this nomination, per the featured article nomination steps? Gary King (talk) 02:28, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment ahh, no... oops. I asked on the article talk page, but no one ever replied there. Sorry about that --Pstanton (talk) 02:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Object unformatted refs, and some blogrefs...perhaps I should spam my blog into Wikipedia (I won't) YellowMonkey (click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model!) 07:37, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Request speedy close I see all of your points, and this was the first time I've ever nominated an article for FA, so I guess I should have read the guidelines more carefully, I'm going to agree that this article needs more work and I apologize for making a accidentally making a frivolous nomination. --Pstanton (talk) 08:50, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.