Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hollow Moon/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was archived by Buidhe via FACBot (talk) 3 October 2022 [1].
- Nominator(s): Feoffer (talk) 00:42, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
This article is about long-discredited conjectures that the Moon might be hollow or otherwise artificial, and how science was able to disprove them. Feoffer (talk) 00:42, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose and recommend peer review. There's uncited text and sources that simply aren't up to FA par, like imdb, Daily Express, and others. Needs sourcing overhaul. Hog Farm Talk 00:59, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Is it appropriate to just snowclose this? Peer review sounds like what I was looking for more than FAC. Feoffer (talk) 01:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, one of the other FAC coordinators can close it. @FAC coordinators: Hog Farm Talk 01:06, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Is it appropriate to just snowclose this? Peer review sounds like what I was looking for more than FAC. Feoffer (talk) 01:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been withdrawn, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. (t · c) buidhe 01:29, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.