Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Guitar/archive1
Appearance
Partly self-nom (I have expanded the Inlays section, but the rest of the article isn't mine.) (However, this could be 'improved' by removing some of the too many external links.)
- Object Very far from FA status. Should make a peer review. For the following reasons
- The article is missing 'national guitar'
- The lists Significant Guitarists, Guitar makers and Guitar technique should be transferred to daughter articles and a summary with overview should replace them.
- Guitar etc. is not an encyclopedic style
- Acoustic and electric guitars should be change into something like Types of guitars
- Expand Guitar amplifier
- Expand Guitar festivals
- Reduce the number of external links
- I think the article could be improved by linking the different style of acoustic and electric guitars with significant guitarists who used them.
Vb 13:39, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
- Object. The image Image:Super400.jpg has no source information. --Carnildo 22:51, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
- Object the article is too much of a list, lead should be longer and consist of only 2-3 paragraphs. =Nichalp «Talk»= 07:14, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
- Object I cannot see including an article as featured when it doesn't meet the three pillars, namely Verifiability. Alan.ca 10:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)