Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Gross domestic product/archive1
Appearance
A highly informative article which is well written, near complete, and fully wikified and formatted. An important subject not well-understood by many. --Christopher 15:13, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Object. Has no references as required by criteria 2c of the Featured article criteria. --Allen3 talk 15:41, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Object. Concur with Allen; no references; lead is way to short; too many lists. AndyZ 20:32, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Object; no references, no inline citations, excessive bold, underdeveloped sections, and lists that should be prose. --Spangineer (háblame) 03:50, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
- Object. Short lead, no references. Too many lists, need converting into prose - Generally needs cleaning up, probably copyediting as well. Refer to peer review. — Wackymacs 19:42, 20 January 2006 (UTC)