Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/German destroyer Z39/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 10:15, 4 April 2018 [1].

German destroyer Z39

Nominator(s): Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 18:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about a German destroyer that served during World War Two. This is the second review of the article, as previously it had issues with context, which I believe have now been resolved. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 18:38, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image is appropriately licensed. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Another star in Iazyges's wheel hat is in order! –Vami _IV✠ 11:08, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I made one copy-edit. Jackdude101 ^talk ^cont 21:39, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source review by Lingzhi

Notes/References formatting is looking pretty good:

Whitley 1988, pp. 56-57. Hyphen in pg. range;
Done
Inconsistent use of Publisher Location (21 with; 4 without): Friedman, Norman (2014); Grooss, Poul (2017); Stern, Robert C. (2015); Zaloga, Steven J. (2011). Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 16:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done

Again, as per the coin article, below – is this a sources review? Brianboulton (talk) 21:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, what happened? Several sources in the "Books" section are now not cited in the article. Did people add new sources, or remove cites? Either way, either delete them or move them into "Further reading" or whatever... Friedman, Norman (2014); Grooss, Poul (2017); Haslop, Dennis (2013); O'Brien, Phillips Payson (2015); Zaloga, Steven J. (2011).
Done
Also, Stern, Robert C. (2015) needs a location. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 11:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done

Comment An issue I noted in my informal review of this article was my concern over the statement that this class of ships had comparable equivalent to a British light cruiser. While the source given is of a high standard, it doesn't seem to be correct. I noted that the contemporary British Town-class cruiser (1936), for example, had a much heavier armament. Older classes were also better armed. I'd suggest looking into this issue. Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Nick-D: per review of the book; the "equal to light cruisers" is explicitly talking about Polish/French ones. How I managed to miss that I have no idea. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 13:04, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Coord note

Sorry but this review hasn't progressed in some time and doesn't have the depth of commentary that permit consensus to promote to be determined, so I'll be archiving it shortly. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 10:15, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Ian Rose (talk) 10:15, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.