Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Gastric-brooding frog/archive1
Appearance
This article has been expanded and copyedited several times by myself. It went through a fairly unsuccessfull peer review. I think that it is worthy of being a FA. (if commenting (or opposing) on/because of inline citations please specify where you see the problem) Thanks -- Froggydarb croak 10:18, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral, good article but I'd like to see more extensive citations throughout. Everyking 09:51, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Per Everyking I'd like to see more in-line citations in some under-referenced sections (like Reproduction).UberCryxic 17:20, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- I got the whole reproduction section from that one citation. -- Froggydarb croak 22:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- But Tyler didn't. Some of the work in Tyler's book is original research, but most comes from research papers. Have a look through the references, and see if you can find the papers on the net. Basically look for any claim which looks like it required research. --liquidGhoul 00:02, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Per UberCryxic. Some sections are under-citated.--Yannismarou 15:24, 19 September 2006 (UTC)