Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Flower/archive1
This article meets all of the requirments worthy of being a featured article. Neutral, well written, pictures balance the article very well, etc. Veracious Rey talk ↔ contribs 13:40, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose This article isn't ready. It needs inline citations per What is a featured article. This line "Several other symbols are used that will have to await drawings to illustrate here (see [1])." is innappropriate, as is the Floristry section User talk:James086|Talk]] | Contribs 14:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Very strong object per James. These problems (which I almost didn't believe when I read James's comment) are inexcusable. -- Kicking222 15:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- If I may add, this is not even remotely close to a Good Article (per WP:WIAGA), much less an FA. -- Kicking222 15:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- The nominator has withdrawn their nomination per this edit. Picaroon 05:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)