Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Finnish parliamentary election, 2011/archive2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by Ucucha 16:09, 28 March 2012 [1].
Finnish parliamentary election, 2011 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured article candidates/Finnish parliamentary election, 2011/archive1
- Featured article candidates/Finnish parliamentary election, 2011/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Lihaas (talk) 08:02, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured article because per a previous nomination the requests/suggestions are now fulfilled, criteria was fulfilled by nom (me) last time. Lihaas (talk) 08:02, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I haven't read the article yet, but at first glance dead links appear to be an issue. Also, the Financial times should be noted with a subscription required template. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:40, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- How do yu check for deadlinks? and put subscription data in the template? Aparentl subscription=yes doesnt workLihaas (talk) 05:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This is the link to the link-checker, it is not showing them all now for some reason, not sure if it's working right. I use the {{subscription required}} template to mark subscriptions, just put in in right after the reference template. Mark Arsten (talk) 07:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Okey, all done with tag on FinTimes and links. Just 1 issue left over the "agenda finland" source which i asked another finnish editor (who worked with me on the article). Guess ill wait for a few days to come up with that or else remove the passage?Lihaas (talk) 09:10, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- This is the link to the link-checker, it is not showing them all now for some reason, not sure if it's working right. I use the {{subscription required}} template to mark subscriptions, just put in in right after the reference template. Mark Arsten (talk) 07:26, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- How do yu check for deadlinks? and put subscription data in the template? Aparentl subscription=yes doesnt workLihaas (talk) 05:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Source review - spotchecks not done, I don't speak Finnish. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:18, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Typo on access date - "Retrived"- Don't italicize publishers
Be consistent in whether you use "Ministry of Justice of Finland" or just "Ministry of Justice"Who publishes this source?This link triggers my anti-virus software404 error- Check for minor inconsistencies like doubled periods, italicization changes, etc
I can't evaluate reliability due to language issues, but formatting needs some cleaning up. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:18, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Getting it done. The agendafin worked for me. I use Norton.- Also just italicised the publishers because the other review said to do so...
- What other formatting needs cleaning up other than the ones listed.
- therwise seems all set?Lihaas (talk) 14:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Not yet. For example, compare italicization on FN 32 vs 33, multiple other instances. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:12, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Okey doing, before the weekend should be done.Lihaas (talk) 06:44, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Not yet. For example, compare italicization on FN 32 vs 33, multiple other instances. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:12, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- therwise seems all set?Lihaas (talk) 14:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.