Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Final Fantasy VII/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by GrahamColm 23:09, 24 September 2012 [1].
Final Fantasy VII (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Niemti (talk) 02:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured article because it just passed A easily. Niemti (talk) 02:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Source review - spotchecks not done
- FN5: caps
- Compare FNs 5 and 7 (and similar) - which is correct?
- FN11: italics
- Instead of writing "Editors of...ed", just put them in the author parameter - though they're editors, in this case they're providing the content
- Use consistent italicization
- What makes this a high-quality reliable source? This?
- FN52: formatting
- Don't mix different families of citation templates
- Check website citations for consistency - for example, compare FNs 65 and 66
- Be consistent in whether you include publishers for magazines
- Dead links need to be fixed
- FN94: page(s)?
- FN116: formatting
Oppose at this point pending significant citation cleanup. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Was indeed not reliable but now it is. It was valid, but objections over how citations are constructed are simply ridicalous. Mostly, because "editors of" thing was silly indeed. I fixed some problems with citations, but only those that actually were problematic. --Niemti (talk) 18:44, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.