Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fin Whale/archive1

I peer reviwed this one first, so do you think it will become a featured article? Daniel10 07:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, Daniel Wikipedia:Peer review/Fin Whale/archive2 advised converting references to inline citations. As far as i see you made no changes after peer review request. For now major problem is using inline citations. And also you can think about other advise. --Ugur Basak 08:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but I don't no how to make an inline citation. How do you do that?Daniel10 09:55, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object. Short on detail, under-referenced, not actively worked on -> problems can't be addressed. Rest in peace until someone finds time to resurrect you. - Samsara (talk • contribs) 15:20, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Support Great article. Very interesting, and well-written. 81.178.108.250 07:51, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object. Not cited, not even close. Sandy 19:07, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What! This is so close to featured, that it is REALLY GOOD! 85.210.27.212 10:03, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The peer review made reference to the fact that "Fin Whale" is capitalized throughout the article. The article falls under WikiProject Cetaceans, whose article standards mandate capitalization of common names of cetacean species. I agree that it looks awkward and is inconsistently applied throughout the article. I have left a note on the project's talk page to see if the standard can be clarified or modified. I've also made some copyedits to the page, but agree that the article sorely lacks references. I'm willing to help convert to inline citations, but need someone with those general reference texts to break them down for me. Neil916 (Talk) 23:03, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]