Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Maryland and Washington, D.C.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted 20:38, 3 February 2007.

Effects of Hurricane Isabel in Maryland and Washington, D.C.

Another article in the Isabel series and another sponsored by the Tropical cyclone Wikiproject, I just published it tonight to the standards of a featured article. Plenty of refs and local reports, as well as in depth info where it needs it. There's one thing I should mention. As a notice, the Tropical cyclone Wikiproject has a standard that references are excluded from the lede, and in the body of the article they are used at the end of every block- that is, block A is three sentences long, and ends with ref A. Comments? Hurricanehink (talk) 03:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support I absolutely love your approach to daughter articles.--Rmky87 06:23, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Another great article from the Tropical cyclone project. Comprehensive, well-written and well-referenced. Out of interest, why do the FEMA references have a padlock next to them? Trebor 14:43, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm pretty sure it's because the site is secured. Hurricanehink (talk) 14:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed, it's because they're using the https protocol. Titoxd^(?!?) 00:35, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oh okay, thanks; I thought it might be something like that. Trebor 00:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support, excellent job. Have you thought about nominating a Hurricane Isabel featured topic? Tuf-Kat 03:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep, that's the plan, but there's still a few other articles that need to get done first. Hurricanehink (talk) 03:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Excellent job, very well-written. One comment - the number of red links is sort of unsightly. Consider asking at WikiProject Maryland for stubs. --Mus Musculus 15:39, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.